Owner identified by court
This is the owner label used in the court record, not a fresh corporate-registry determination.02
Read the case behind the link →Ownership · Operations · Trade · Finance
Follow a documented relationship—not a cloud of suggestive names. Each link below identifies the source, the period and what the relationship actually means.
This is the owner label used in the court record, not a fresh corporate-registry determination.02
Read the case behind the link →Vessel-level conduct and company-level sanctions remain distinct.03
Read the case behind the link →Current operator and original registration records still need verification.15
Read the case behind the link →Both the company and individual entered guilty pleas; later sentencing is recorded.0635
Read the case behind the link →A service relationship is not a finding of knowing assistance or illegality.05
Read the case behind the link →Pingtan disclosed collateral supporting Hong Long’s borrowing. The disclosure does not establish lender complicity.37
Read the case behind the link →The ministry separately left the relationship with Ming Xiang 899 open for further investigation.36
Read the case behind the link →Operator attribution comes from the investigation; not a current registry certification.43
Read the case behind the link →A company-level payment record; this does not establish current beneficial ownership.40
Read the case behind the link →A prosecution-stage connection, not a finding that the company was convicted.47
Read the case behind the link →Requested penalties are not a final judgment.47
Read the case behind the link →Domestic Argentine operation; flag and ultimate control are separate questions.4950
Read the case behind the link →Chinese birthplace is not evidence of state direction or a separate offense.5073
Read the case behind the link →The vessel was sold in 2018 and removed from the SPRFMO IUU list in 2020.6866
Read the case behind the link →This is a dated corporate link, not a current ownership assertion or a fraud conviction.67
Read the case behind the link →The U.S. processor’s conduct is not attributed to every overseas supplier.697071
Read the case behind the link →Disputed ownership is identified as disputed in the relevant file. A company that supplied a service or financing is not automatically responsible for another actor’s conduct.
Read the disputed-attribution file →Selected profiles
51 selected profiles connected to the case collection. The role and the evidence differ from one record to another. Inclusion is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Refrigerated carrier in the Ecuador wildlife-transport proceedings
Owner named in the judicial record
Vessel in Argentina–Indonesia enforcement account
Sanctioned fleet company; historical WRO subject
Individual designated in connection with Dalian Ocean Fishing
Tuna/longline vessel in labor-abuse reporting and government findings
Designated company with SEC-filed compliance response
Designated fishing company in Treasury’s network account
Individual designated in the Pingtan/Honglong network
Fishing operator in carrier/support research
Carrier company in support-network research
Vessel in reported labor and death incidents
Operator associated with Wei Yu 18 by investigative record
Seafood processing company listed in 2024 UFLPA action
Company that entered a marine-wildlife smuggling guilty plea
Kaven owner who entered a guilty plea
Fishing vessel in Natuna confrontation
Party disputing attributed ownership/control in carrier investigation
Carrier in disputed-attribution research
Carrier in disputed-attribution research
Vessel named in an Argentine international capture-order announcement
Vessel named in the ministry’s unauthorized-transfer notice
Vessel named in the ministry’s unauthorized-transfer notice
Vessel named in the ministry’s unauthorized-transfer notice
Vessel subject to an unauthorized AIS-change finding
Vessel sharing the AIS number in the ministry notice
Company named for Hai Zhi Xing 801
Operating company in the related-party financing disclosure
Lender named in a historical company financing disclosure
Fishing vessel investigated for crew abuses and subject to the May 2025 U.S. seafood WRO.
Operator identified by The Outlaw Ocean Project; denies the reported abuses.
Chinese-flagged squid vessel captured in Argentina in May 2020.
Vessel returned to Puerto Madryn following April 2020 detection.
Company named in the Argentine government’s payment account.
Chinese vessel involved in a 2018 Peruvian squid seizure and later prosecution.
Captain named in the 2020 prosecution announcement; final judgment not verified.
Company named in the prosecutor’s requested joint civil reparation.
Argentine vessel investigated over toothfish catches and reporting.
Owner/operator associated with Tai An; reported incidental-catch defense.
Chinese-born entrepreneur associated with Prodesur; not identified as a state official.
Individual convicted according to Peru’s 2023 official reports of attempted shark-fin export.
Defendant sentenced in 2014 in the Mexico–U.S. totoaba-smuggling case.
Vessel named in 2020 Indonesian survivor and recruiter-investigation reporting.
Chinese squid vessel analyzed for multiple broadcast identities in 2020.
One of two vessels in the August 2022 refused-inspection dispute; not placed on the 2023 final IUU list.
One of two vessels in the August 2022 refused-inspection dispute; not placed on the 2023 final IUU list.
Processing mother ship historically IUU-listed; renamed and delisted in 2020.
Historical company associated with the Damanzaihao; no claim of current control.
Historical corporate group associated with the vessel and Peruvian operations.
Virginia processor in the false domestic-origin crab case.
Owner sentenced in January 2019 for the crab-labeling conspiracy.